The day’s top political news:
The White House strikes back
On the defensive over the economy and health care, the White House is shooting back with a double-barreled message for its critics and skeptics.
To Republicans who say the stimulus isn’t working: Back off. To moderate Democrats wary of health care reform: “We’re watching you.”
Doing all it can to impose higher taxes, and promoting government takeover of healthcare, the struggle becomes more and more desperate as opposition to the Obama extremes become better and better organized.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25003.html
Sotomayor Plays Hearing Close to the Vest
Abortion, Antritrust and Gun Rights Are Discussed, but Senators Don't Glean Much Information; 'Give Me Your Opinion'
Sotomayor provides a demonstration of “Bob and Weave” to avoid candid answers to critical questions.
Sure of confirmation, Sotomayor tells Senators what she thinks normal Americans want to hear – not what she really thinks.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124765763843744783.html
Obama Opposes House Plan to Protect Chrysler, GM Dealerships
President Barack Obama “strongly opposes” an effort in Congress to require General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC to restore relationships shed during bankruptcy proceedings, while stopping short of a veto threat.
The House of Representatives is slated to vote tomorrow on a bill that would require the automakers to restore their franchise agreements as a condition of receiving federal aid. The plan, opposed by both GM and Chrysler, comes amid complaints from lawmakers that the carmakers terminated dealerships with little notice or explanation.
Many of the dealership cancellations are seen to have had political implications – anti liberals suffering larger numbers of cancellations.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aioxPp9w.vzM
Opinion:
Rise up! A call to action for all normal Americans
A couple of weeks ago, about 300 people in Panama City, Florida, spontaneously gathered in an angry demonstration through which to ambush their member of Congress, “Blue Dog” Democrat Allen Boyd for his vote for the infamous Democrat tax scheme known as “Cap and Trade”. Democrats try to disguise the bill as an environmental issue, the facts show it’s a major tax bill that will cost EVERY American family additional thousands of dollars in new taxes EACH AND EVERY YEAR.
Boyd was stunned by the demonstration and had to sneak out of town out a back door. Since then, one of the movements involved, “Tell Washington No” .com has attracted lots of attention. What’s more, news if the Panama City demonstration success has spread to other towns and cities and others who voted for the Cap and Trade conspiracy, have felt some of the heat.
Normal America needs to turn up that heat. Especially since Obama’s scheme for government take over of our healthcare system is looming.
Meanwhile, Boyd is having to generate paid television commercials that attempt to give him cover. Fortunately, among many of his voters, the spots are backfiring. Plus, voters are beginning to notice the commercials are being financed by under the table dollars provided by a California-based environmental company – obviously one willing to spend such a huge amount of money on local commercials protecting Boyd, because the company anticipated sweet government contracts if the Cap and Trade scam passes.
That environmental scam shows just how desperate the left is in getting this bill passed, and just how crucial they see getting this tax passed is for private groups drooling over being able to feed from the public trough. Seeing the full picture reveals just how corrupt the process truly is…its stunning in its reach, implications, and in what it reveals.
If a California company is willing to spend such a huge amount of money on a remote Congressional district political race, how much more are they spending and where are they spending it? More to the point, what is the payoff anticipated by this California “environmental” firm? The desperation being displayed in Panama City raises bigger questions that must be confronted.
Most important of all, the full story of the Allen Boyd case, shows such local demonstrations can have massive impact and attract serious attention from our domestic enemies.
How to Organize an “Allen Boyd – type” protest:
1. First, determine the true nature of the battle field. What district are you in? You are in either a district represented by an unchallenged or unbeatable Congressman, or you are in a district in which the Congressman is vulnerable.
2. We are preparing a list of targets based on vulnerability. It will be posted on WWW.TellWashingtonNo.com. You should alert everyone on your address book list to the target list. We need everyone. We need more Republicans if we are going to protect our access to quality healthcare and if we are going to escape the huge tax ravage of the Democrat Cap and Trade scam.
3. If you are not in a district represented by a vulnerable Congressman, you are needed in the nationwide effort, and needed badly.
4. If your congressman is vulnerable, we need to work to defeat or protect him. Our end product must be defeating Democrats and defending Republicans. Stopping the Obama threat is a matter of numbers. At present, Democrats have dominating numbers through which Obama can make good any scheme he wishes to impose.
5. You should do all you can to organize. That means creating networks through emails. Identify all friends and relatives who are sufficiently concerned to be willing – or anxious enough – to act effectively.
6. Encourage your address book contacts to join in creating a network too. As we move forward, we need to be able to pass along information regarding pending action and legislation that threatens normal America. This must be done through email extensions.
7. Make sure ALL who vote with us, are registered to vote. Don’t assume anyone is registered. Ask. If they are not registered, make sure they get registered. It works for ACORN, it will work for us – except we will register legitimate voters – not voters who never existed or who are not eligible to vote. Keep in mind Democrats will be using ACORN and similar groups to register thousands – we need to compete. Competing is up to those on your list.
8. Be alert to web sites and emails that threaten Republicans and those which provide new information about vulnerable Democrats. Make sure all your contacts fully understand what is at stake in this struggle.
9. Identify opportunities to strike. If you note your Democrat congressman is due to speak locally, use your email network to organize a spontaneous demonstration through which to voice anger at his vote for Cap and Trade or his support for the healthcare conspiracy from Obama. Replicate our ambush of Allen Boyd and make sure someone gets video. (pass the video on to the TellWashingtonNo.com site and we’ll add it to our display)
10. Create a list of our supporters. We have over a year before the next election. That provides time in which long lists of our people can be developed. Don’t let lack of perfection produce lack of action. If your list is only a hundred voters, getting ALL 100 to vote can be crucially important.
11. On election day, email your list again and again until everyone assures you they have voted. Be insistent. Making sure everyone on your list votes. Remember how close elections such as the recent Senate seat in Minnesota was. Keep in mind Democrats will use all sorts of devices to win close elections.
12. Take care to make sure Obama’s ACORN or a similar group, doesn’t succeed in vote theft or fraud. Report cases of fraud and theft to the Tell Washington site. We will send them further – but real challenges must come at the local level.
This is the first call to action in this project. Expect more. Feel free to offer your own insight and suggestions.
Buddy
The day’s top blogs:
1.
The Obama healthcare scheme and scam: It's Not An Option
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Congress: It didn't take long to run into an "uh-oh" moment when reading the House's "health care for all Americans" bill. Right there on Page 16 is a provision making individual private medical insurance illegal.
When we first saw the paragraph Tuesday, just after the 1,018-page document was released, we thought we surely must be misreading it. So we sought help from the House Ways and Means Committee.
It turns out we were right: The provision would indeed outlaw individual private coverage. Under the Orwellian header of "Protecting The Choice To Keep Current Coverage," the "Limitation On New Enrollment" section of the bill clearly states:
"Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day" of the year the legislation becomes law.
So we can all keep our coverage, just as promised — with, of course, exceptions: Those who currently have private individual coverage won't be able to change it. Nor will those who leave a company to work for themselves be free to buy individual plans from private carriers.
(NOTE: After all is said and done – the healthcare issue boils down to a case of quality versus price – quality healthcare versus Obama’s healthcare on the cheap, and a question of access. Obama and other Democrats want senior citizens to “die and get out of the way”. There is solid reason to suspect senior citizens could be denied care under the Obama scheme.)
From the beginning, opponents of the public option plan have warned that if the government gets into the business of offering subsidized health insurance coverage, the private insurance market will wither. Drawn by a public option that will be 30% to 40% cheaper than their current premiums because taxpayers will be funding it, employers will gladly scrap their private plans and go with Washington's coverage.
The nonpartisan Lewin Group estimated in April that 120 million or more Americans could lose their group coverage at work and end up in such a program. That would leave private carriers with 50 million or fewer customers. This could cause the market to, as Lewin Vice President John Sheils put it, "fizzle out altogether."
What wasn't known until now is that the bill itself will kill the market for private individual coverage by not letting any new policies be written after the public option becomes law.
The legislation is also likely to finish off health savings accounts, a goal that Democrats have had for years. They want to crush that alternative because nothing gives individuals more control over their medical care, and the government less, than HSAs.
With HSAs out of the way, a key obstacle to the left's expansion of the welfare state will be removed.
The public option won't be an option for many, but rather a mandate for buying government care. A free people should be outraged at this advance of soft tyranny.
Washington does not have the constitutional or moral authority to outlaw private markets in which parties voluntarily participate. It shouldn't be killing business opportunities, or limiting choices, or legislating major changes in Americans' lives.
It took just 16 pages of reading to find this naked attempt by the political powers to increase their reach. It's scary to think how many more breaches of liberty we'll come across in the final 1,002.
2.
BORN IN THE USA?
Pentagon orders soldier fired for challenging prez
Army warrior terminated from job after questioning Obama eligibility
Chelsea Schilling
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Dr. Orly Taitz
The Department of Defense has compelled a private employer to fire a U.S. Army Reserve major from his civilian job after he had his military deployment orders revoked for arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office.
According to the CEO of Simtech Inc., a private company contracted by the Defense Security Services, an agency of the Department of Defense, the federal agency has compelled the termination of Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook.
Cook's attorney, Orly Taitz, wrote in her blog that Simtech CEO Larry Grice said he would try to find another position within the company for Cook, but nothing is currently available.
The Department of Defense does contracting in the general field of information technology/systems integration, at which Cook, a senior systems engineer and architect, was employed until taking a military leave of absence on July 10 in preparation for his deployment to Afghanistan.
"Grice told Plaintiff, in essence, that the situation had become 'nutty and crazy,' and that plaintiff would no longer be able to work at his old position," Taitz wrote.
Grice made clear that it was Defense Security Services that had compelled Simtech to fire Cook.
According to the report, Grice told Cook "there was some gossip that 'people were disappointed in' the plaintiff because they thought he was manipulating his deployment orders to create a platform for political purposes."
The Simtech CEO then discussed Cook's expectation of final paychecks, without any severance pay, and wished the soldier well.
"A federal agency (such as the Department of Defense, acting through the Defense Security Services Agency) clearly violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if it takes or fails to take (or threatens to take or fail to take) a personnel action with respect to any employee or applicant because of any disclosure of information by the employee or applicant that he or she reasonably believes evidences a violation of a law, rule or regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety," Taitz wrote.
"What has happened in the present case of Stefan Frederick Cook is that a federal agency appears to have taken action against Stefan Frederick Cook's private employer, Simtech, Inc., which is a closely held corporation owned and operated by members of a single family, who are as much victims of the Department of Defense's heavy-handed interference with plaintiff Cook's private-sector employment as is plaintiff Cook himself."
(NOTE: This case provides further evidence that Obama WAS NOT born on US soil. His campaign had an obligation to prove his eligibility. They have not only failed that obligation, but have gone to extraordinary extremes to hide the facts. The Democrat party organization was obligated to vet Obama and all other candidates, and be able to assure American voters that ALL their candidates were qualified to meet the Constitutional requirements. The conclusion is obvious – but nothing will happen because “the fix is in” and racial intimidation is preventing honest resolution of things.)
As WND reported, Taitz confirmed to WND the military rescinded his impending deployment orders.
"We won! We won before we even arrived," she said with excitement. "It means that the military has nothing to show for Obama. It means that the military has directly responded by saying Obama is illegitimate - and they cannot fight it. Therefore, they are revoking the order!"
She continued, "They just said, 'Order revoked.' No explanation. No reasons - just revoked."
A hearing on the questions raised by Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, an engineer who told WND he wants to serve his country in Afghanistan, was scheduled for July 16 at 9:30 a.m.
Join the petition campaign to make President Obama reveal his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!
"As an officer in the armed forces of the United States, it is [my] duty to gain clarification on any order we may believe illegal. With that said, if President Obama is found not to be a 'natural-born citizen,' he is not eligible to be commander-in-chief," he told WND only hours after the case was filed.
"[Then] any order coming out of the presidency or his chain of command is illegal. Should I deploy, I would essentially be following an illegal [order]. If I happened to be captured by the enemy in a foreign land, I would not be privy to the Geneva Convention protections," he said.
The order for the hearing in the federal court for the Middle District of Georgia from U.S. District Judge Clay D. Land said the hearing on the request for a temporary restraining order would be held Thursday.
Want to turn up the pressure to learn the facts? Get your signs and postcards asking for the president's birth certificate documentation here.
Cook said without a legitimate president as commander-in-chief, members of the U.S. military in overseas actions could be determined to be "war criminals and subject to prosecution."
He said the vast array of information about Obama that is not available to the public confirms to him "something is amiss."
"That and the fact the individual who is occupying the White House has not been entirely truthful with anybody," he said. "Every time anyone has made an inquiry, it has been either cast aside, it has been maligned, it has been laughed at or just dismissed summarily without further investigation.
"You know what. It would be so simple to solve. Just produce the long-form document, certificate of live birth," he said.
Cook said he was scheduled to report for duty today to deploy to Afghanistan as part of President Obama's plan to increase pressure of insurgent forces there.
He told WND he would be prepared for a backlash against him as a military officer, since members of the military swear to uphold and follow their orders. However, he noted that following an illegal order would be just as bad as failing to follow a legal order.
Before news of the orders being revoked were reported, MSNBC anchor Keith Olbermann tonight called Cook a "jackass" and Taitz a "conwoman," as he labeled both of them the "worst persons in the world." He flayed the soldier as "an embarrassment to all those who have served without cowardice."
Named as defendants in the case are Col. Wanda Good, Col. Thomas Macdonald, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Obama, described as "de facto president of the United States."
According to the court filing, Cook affirmed when he joined the military, he took the following oath: "I, Stefan Frederick Cook, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."
According to the claim, "Plaintiff submits that it is implicit though not expressly stated that an officer is and should be subject to court-martial, because he will be derelict in the performance of his duties, if he does not inquire as to the lawfulness, the legality, the legitimacy of the orders which he has received, whether those orders are specific or general."
The military courts offer no option for raising the question, so he turned to civilian courts to consider "a question of paramount constitutional and legal importance: the validity of the chain of command under a president whose election, eligibility, and constitutional status appear open to serious question."
"Barack Hussein Obama, in order to prove his constitutional eligibility to serve as president, basically needs only produce a single unique historical document for the Plaintiff's inspection and authentication: namely, the 'long-form' birth certificate which will confirm whether Barack Hussein Obama was in fact born to parents who were both citizens of the United States in Honolulu, Hawaii, in or about 1961," explains the complaint.
Taitz said she will attend the hearing to amend the temporary restraining order to an injunction because more members of the military have joined the cause.
"We are going to be asking for release of Obama's records because now this completely undermines the military. It revoked this order, but it can come up with another order tomorrow. It can come up with orders for other people," she said. "Am I going to be flying around the country 1,000 times and paying the fees every time they issue an order?"
Defendant Col. Wanda Good filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff's action for a temporary restraining order today.
Taitz said the issue "must be resolved immediately," and she will continue working to ensure Obama proves he is eligible for office.
"We're going to be asking the judge to issue an order for Obama to provide his vital records to show he is legitimately president," she said. "We're going to say, we have orders every day, and we'll have revocations every day. This issue has to be decided."
She said there cannot be any harm to the president if he is legitimately holding office.
"If he is legitimate, then his vital records will prove it," Taitz said. "If he is illegitimate, then he should not have been there in the first place."
Asked what this decision means for every other serviceman who objects to deployment under a president who has not proven he is eligible for office, Taitz responded:
"Now, we can have each and every member of the military - each and every enlistee and officer - file something similar saying 'I will not take orders until Obama is legitimately vetted.'"
Multiple questions have been raised about what that would mean to the 2008 election, to the orders and laws Obama has signed and other issues, including whether he then is a valid commander-in-chief of the military.
3.
Dem says tax cuts blunted the stimulus
Walter Alarkon and Kevin Bogardus
Congress cut taxes by too much and did not include enough money for transportation projects when it passed a $787 billion stimulus bill this year, the Democratic chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee said Monday.
Rep. Jim Oberstar (Minn.) stopped short of saying Congress should move a second stimulus, as some Democrats have recently suggested. But he told The Hill on Monday that lawmakers could create jobs by passing his own big-ticket public-works legislation: a $500 billion surface transportation reauthorization bill.
Oberstar defended the $27 billion in the stimulus for highway and bridge projects as the right amount to help the economy during the next year. However, he said that more transit money in the stimulus would have been helpful to an economic recovery over the next three years, rather than the nearly $300 billion in tax cuts.
“Not many people realize they got a tax cut,” Oberstar said. “I have not received a single e-mail, phone call, snail mail, personal comment from anybody since we enacted this bill, since the end of February, saying, ‘I got my tax’ or ‘Thanks for the tax cut’ or ‘I hardly noticed it’ or anything.
“But I have had people saying, ‘I’m back at work because of the funding in the surface transportation program.’ ”
Oberstar’s remarks come as Democrats are second-guessing the effectiveness of the stimulus bill they passed with little Republican support in February. The legislation has been criticized for not creating enough jobs. The June unemployment rate hit 9.5 percent, a 26-year high.
(NOTE: Expect the unemployment rate to exceed 10%. The “stimulus” plan was nothing but a desperate Democrat scheme based on throwing money at the problem – but planning for that money to hit closer to the 2012 election and thus fund a boost to re-election plans by the Obama conspirators. Never doubt this “stimulus” scam is as political as it gets – if it helps people, so much the better.)
Vice President Biden said last week that the Obama administration had “misread” how bad the economy was. Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and other top Democrats haven’t ruled out a second stimulus, but they said that the $787 billion recovery package needs to be given more time to work.
But off Capitol Hill, momentum has grown for more public-works spending to create jobs. In addition to Oberstar, Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D) and Laura Tyson, a member of the president’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, have said that another stimulus with billions for infrastructure and transportation may be needed to boost the economy.
“It’s what produces jobs, and produces orders for factories — American factories,” Rendell said during a House hearing on the first stimulus last week.
Oberstar said a better option than a second stimulus would be to pass his bill authorizing highway, rail and mass transit projects over the next six years. He also said Democrats need to be more patient with the first stimulus.
“Let’s make sure this portion is working well before you talk about the next one,” Oberstar said of the first stimulus. He expects by Labor Day to see 250,000 new construction jobs, another 30,000 jobs in bus and train manufacturing and 25,000 new jobs for work on water projects.
“All of that is moving and the pipeline is in full swing. Then, I think by March of next year, you could reassess and move ahead with a second injection,” he said.
One thing he’s sure of is that Democrats focused too much on tax cuts in the stimulus bill.
President Obama at one point suggested that 40 percent of the stimulus be in tax cuts — a move intended to win over Republican votes. But Democrats settled on $287 billion, or about 36 percent of the bill’s total. The effort only resulted in three Republican votes — all in the Senate.
Oberstar said those cuts would have been put to better use in transportation projects.
“We did not overstate the possibilities, but I think we clearly could have put $300 billion in highway, bridge, transit, airport, water, wastewater treatment and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,” he said.
4.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/07/decline_and_fall_2.html
Decline and fall
D.L. Hammack
It matters not what the label of the day is, America, in the grasps of an administration that recognizes no boundaries, is changing right before our eyes. Whether you choose to call it Corporatism, Socialism, Fascism, or Marxism, the fact remains that we are witnessing, after many years of gradual decay in America; the end of what has built this country: Capitalism.
Overwhelmed by the massive amount of bills, spending, regulatory reforms and sweeping legislation, it's hard for Americans to keep up with the flurry of activity in Washington. It's no doubt that this hurried (crisis) pace is intended. These are the final days of entrepreneurial capitalism as we know it. She's on her last legs. She's being tossed aside like yesterday's garbage...cast out without regard to her accomplishments over the past 200 years, only to be replaced by the concept of "shared wealth".
(NOTE: “Shared wealth” of course, is a polite term for socialism or – even worse – communism. It harks back to the Marxist theme “from each, according to his ability, to each, according to his need”. It’s an approach to government and to society that is a proven failure. Yet die-hard leftists such as Obama an almost all current Democrats, work overtime to impose that system of madness … and currently have the political power to do it. Democrats have the numbers, so debate and argument matters not.)
As she takes her last breaths, we agonize wondering how we let it come to this point. Gasping, she looks at us with eyes glazed over in despair. We knew that this administration was not concerned with small business, but how did we let them rip the spirit from our hands? We saw the big push for cap and trade legislation-but did we act? Deep in our hearts, we knew that the massive health care reform bill would be another nail in her coffin, but did we revolt? Seeing the ridiculous bailouts, handouts and mortgaging of our future, did we stand up and voice our dismay? How can we, with a clear conscience, admit that we truly felt that cap and trade was going to repair the ails of climate change, or that a national health care system would reduce overall health costs?
As a small businessperson, I -- unlike the current administration -- recognize that hope is not a business plan. I must look to the future and determine what is best for my company. I must make decisions now that reflect what my business will look like in six months and beyond. Based on proposed legislation and the current climate in Washington, and our inability to get the attention of our representatives, it is apparent that my future business opportunities lie elsewhere. The crystal ball is clouded only in more taxes, the potential of forced heath care payments for employees, excessive costs and lost business through the proposed cap and trade and a general disgust for the small businesses that provide 70% of the nation's GDP.
I've been screaming, but nobody's listening.
My last employee has been laid off. If the proposed cap and trade legislation is passed, it will be the death knell for me. As the great lady named Capitalism passes, so too shall my endeavor. We shall pass together, both wondering how a great nation allowed this to occur on our watch.
5.
http://theblacksphere.net/site/acorn-chasing-runaway-slave/
ACORN – Chasing runaway slave
Reminiscent of the days when the slaves escaped the plantation, and Massa rounded up area plantation owners and law enforcement to get his property back, we are witness to a repeat of history. Democrat slave owners, ACORN are intent on capturing former ACORN member turned whistleblower, Anita MonCrief (slave). They will do so by suing her.
I’m just going to call it like it is. ACORN suing Anita MonCrief is “the real man keeping a sista down. “ If ACORN were a Republican organization, this story would get more press coverage than MLK’s funeral. However, since there is no Republican boogeyman, ignorant blacks will be silent. Don’t expect white Democrats—normally meddlers par excellent—to meddle here either. The poverty pimps, Jackson and Sharpton—redundant, since I already mentioned ignorant blacks—will be silent as well.
Little ACORN all “growed” up into a big Oak tree, a fitting fate awaits MonCrief, as she is about to be lynched—Democrat-style. Only difference from the past is that MonCrief won’t die a physical lynching, but a financial lynching.
White racist Democrat elites treating blacks like chattel to keep them “in their place” is nothing new at all. The only thing missing are the burning crosses, white robes and “night raids.” Even with all those past accoutrements missing, racist Democrat dealings with blacks have only changed in tactics.
What was Anita MonCrief’s crime? She exposed how ACORN is using blacks to do the bidding of wealthy whites, only to get fed pig feet, while ACORN’s elite enjoy pork tenderloin. She exposed the inner workings of the highly partisan Democrat (actually communist) organization and its ties to His Lowness, one Barack “Insane” Obama. And for her actions, the racist Democrat machine released the hounds of hell on her. ACORN will not have other blacks trying to escape the prison that is the plantation.
Like slaves of the past, blacks today live in a prison bounded by no walls—bounded only by ignorance. Imagine the idea of waking up each and every day with freedom all around you, yet all you see is an invisible fortress. There is no desire to escape, because you have been systematically told that escape is futile. Such was the life of black slaves past. Today is no different.
As I wrote in a previous blog, ACORN is the perfect example of how Democrat whites view blacks. To the Democrats—true racists and elitists—blacks serve nothing more than to help them accomplish their goals which are two-fold. (1) Get rich, and (2) act like they are helping others, as the elitist Democrats get rich.
Anita Moncrief writes in her blog which I reference from Michelle Malkin’s site:
“It is ironic that ACORN management did not seem comfortable with African Americans in positions of power within the staff ranks (unless they could be used in some way) but it was okay to have the dues paying community leaders as the fall guys. For example, and with respect to a woman who has accomplished a great deal; it was common knowledge among staff that Maude Hurd was a pawn used by the Rathke’s to present the comforting, black, strong, mother image to the community. The emotion that meeting Ms. Hurd brought to some members would be awe inspiring, if [it] were not for ACORN’s ulterior motives.”
(NOTE: Understand the reality: Obama’s own ACORN is an effective conspiracy aimed at carrying out a political strategy of long standing. ACORN exists to find and register voters almost certain to vote Democrat. It is not a civic endeavor, it is not an endeavor aimed and improving neighborhoods, it’s a political action effort, plain and simple. As might be expected, a mass of dollars and payouts has rewarded those who created the scheme and made it work. Hey, Obama is a product of the Chicago Democrat Machine, the most corrupt political operation in the country. What else can we expect from their ACORN?))
Here’s the wrap:
MonCrief was an ACORN insider and a one-time disciple of the movement that she now attempts to expose. She has nothing to gain here, except to hopefully help a few blacks realize that they are being played, manipulated to the highest degree. But for her efforts to help her people escape bondage, pursue freedom as it were, she must be stopped at all costs by the Left.
Suing MonCrief was not just for her. It was Massa’s way of saying to other blacks, “If you escape the plantation, we will come get you.” It was also a warning for non-blacks to “tend to your own slaves.”
And racist Democrats will keep their own slaves in check—district by district. They will continue to pander to blacks. Dole out a few more biscuits. As blacks slowly discover the Democrats’ dirty little secrets, the Dems will give more and more—but still only just enough to keep blacks wanting. Belly’s hungry, blacks will continue to wait on their next meal. More pig feet.
That’s my rant!
© 2009 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved
Every one understands that our life is very expensive, however people require money for various things and not every one gets enough money. Thus to receive some mortgage loans or secured loan would be a proper way out.
Posted by: Conner21Therese | August 13, 2010 at 02:01 AM